oh and just to leave you with one more thing i found this stuff that was written and its all true see im not the only one who can use simple logic
I know you think I'm crazy, and about a year ago, I would have thought I was crazy too.
But now more than ever, I believe that a boxer would win a fight with a Mixed Martial Artist, or Ultimate Fighter.
There's one simple reason for this: Boxers would be absolutely superior on their feet. It wouldn't even be a contest.
I've argued this with several people now, and nobody has been able to sway me (while I was sober).
I'll admit, I don't watch a ton of UFC, but I've watched enough to see that stand-up figthers seem to do well, and a lot of fights are essentially won with a shot from the stand-up position.
While some of these fighters look like they know what they're doing on their feet as far as boxing goes, they would be completely schooled by an actual boxer in this regard. Their hand positioning isn't half bad most of the time, but a boxer would be real good at exploiting any weakness there.
Also, most non-boxers have a way of tipping their punches, whether it be loading up by dropping their hands or cocking back. A real boxer would see this by watching tape just once and exploit it with little problem. I'd venture to say an ultimate fighter wouldn't even land one solid punch against the boxer.
As for hand speed and power, no doubt some ultimate fighters have those skills to rival a boxer, but I doubt they are 100% properly honed. A boxer is trained to get the most out of his speed and power, meaning he knows where and when to strike to get maximum efficiency from his punches. Add that into everything I've already said (bad stances, tipping punches) and you'd see some devastating knockouts from the boxers.
Now, the No. 1 argument for ultimate fighters is their ability to get a boxer down and put him into a submission or just work him over. That is obviously the biggest concern for a boxer, but I don't see it as that easy to take a boxer down.
If an Ultimate Fighter were to shoot on a boxer, he'd have to do it without getting met by an uppercut to the chin, or a shot to the jaw. This takes away a lot of good shots, seeing that a head-down shot is normally easy to fight off, even for the most novice of wrestlers.
And if things were to get in tight, the boxer would be better apt to shorten up his punches and do damage. A short hook is one of, if not the, most devastating punches in boxing.
Let's remember, the most dominant wrestlers are normally the best takedown wrestlers, because you start on your feet. It's the same with MMA, especially when the disparity is that great on your feet.
You may be impressed with the stand-up ability of an ultimate fighter against other ultimate fighters. But there are way too many holes in their games to be able to stand in the ring with an actual boxer.
i got it from here
http://daily-forecast.blogspot.com/2...-fighters.html
Bookmarks