saddam hanged?

[Chickenjorge]

did everyone see saddam was sentenced to the death penalty?

they said he'll be hanged.

do you guys think he'll really be hanged, or that death row in iraq is like in the u.s. where it takes years for your turn and people die of age, rather than their actual sentence?

[jbatesball]

30 days! After the appeal, which will bequick, he will hand in 30 days! Gonna be crispy!

[CHE]

i wish they would record it. i wanna see it

[ninjashoes]

He did worse to so many people

[Squirrel]

Hang this bastard of shitz!

[Axeman]

Hang this bastard of shitz!

no dont hang him, that piece of shit needs to be tortured very slowly, they need to peel his skin away from his body little by little, day by day, poke and prode him, just enough pain to keep him alive for days or weeks then when he feels just a little bit of the pain and suffering that he has caused millions upon millions of people then they can kill him. make that bastard suffer!!!! fuck him.

[Chickenjorge]

i agree with the axeman. haha, how ironic, axe man, fuckin brutal mother fucker.

anyway...
yeah, and they should also give him the chinese water torture.: chain him up. so he cant move. and drop by drop of water going on his forehead. as the days go by the headache will be so immense that he'll die of the pain.

now that's fuckin ruthless

[Axeman]

i agree with the axeman. haha, how ironic, axe man, fuckin brutal mother fucker.

anyway...
yeah, and they should also give him the chinese water torture.: chain him up. so he cant move. and drop by drop of water going on his forehead. as the days go by the headache will be so immense that he'll die of the pain.

now that's fuckin ruthless

I like your way of thinking chickenjorge. fucking nice.

[Evil]

i wish they would record it. i wanna see it


I'm sure they will.

[Beanflicker]

I couldn't believe there were places that still hung people. You fucking crazy Arab motherfuckers. It seems crazy to me that they are going to kill a supervillian like Saddam with a noose, just like they would kill some guy who stole a loaf of bread over there. Saddam deserves a better sendoff than that. Blow him up, fire him out of a cannon, force him to watch a Paulie Shore movie marathon. Give him a good send off, hanging him is both unoriginal and doesn't do him justice.

[klataubarad]

He will be hung. I know Al-Jazeer wanted to air it. But I dont think it will be allowed. Either way vids of it will be rampent on the internet im sure. Every America/Iraqi and his brother will do everything he can to tape it give the chance. I know I would.

[Axeman]

fuck all the hanging talk, torture the son-of-a-bitch.

[groundfighter]

hope it is slow!

[Tom Stall]

why for all the hate for saddam. by murdering him, they are essentially making him a martyr for all the fundamentalist islamic groups. his overthrow isn't suppose to orchestrated by a sovereign power but by his own people. I don't agree with his rule using the iron fist but i strongly feel that regardless of that fact, we shouldn't form a precedent of invading contries that we feel doesn't have "democractic" values. The US aren't allowed to assassinate people anymore so their new stradegy is to waste billions of dollars to wage war on a farce that isn't concrete in terms of evidence. Everyone speaks about the troops that died. that amount is nothing compared to the civilian deaths. you are not freeing the people. you are leading them to chaos and death. a high ball of civilian death toll is 2.5 of their total population( its about 500 people a day) think about that? how many troops did we lose compared to how many deaths of people we are suppose to free
By allowing that, what is stopping israel to start invading all it's surrounding country on the guise of spreading democracy and searching for nukes. Its fuckin selective judgement, how come they don't invade Israel, north korea, pakistan and india. those countries never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Even israel has more wmd than most european nations. i believe they are at around #4-7 in terms of total nuclear weapons.

[Axeman]

why for all the hate for saddam. by murdering him, they are essentially making him a martyr for all the fundamentalist islamic groups. his overthrow isn't suppose to orchestrated by a sovereign power but by his own people. I don't agree with his rule using the iron fist but i strongly feel that regardless of that fact, we shouldn't form a precedent of invading contries that we feel doesn't have "democractic" values. The US aren't allowed to assassinate people anymore so their new stradegy is to waste billions of dollars to wage war on a farce that isn't concrete in terms of evidence. Everyone speaks about the troops that died. that amount is nothing compared to the civilian deaths. you are not freeing the people. you are leading them to chaos and death. a high ball of civilian death toll is 2.5 of their total population( its about 500 people a day) think about that? how many troops did we lose compared to how many deaths of people we are suppose to free
By allowing that, what is stopping israel to start invading all it's surrounding country on the guise of spreading democracy and searching for nukes. Its fuckin selective judgement, how come they don't invade Israel, north korea, pakistan and india. those countries never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Even israel has more wmd than most european nations. i believe they are at around #4-7 in terms of total nuclear weapons.


think about this....out of those 500 people, how many were killed by thier OWN people ??? I would have to say more than 300 considering all the car bombs and suicide bombers there are !!!

[Tom Stall]

were they actively killing each other in that scale before the us invaded? i think not. i don't agree with saddam's regime but he brought order to iraq. How many people have to die for this senseless shit. There is no real purpose for this war. you try to bring up the arguement about more than 300 die everyday from their own people. ok i give you that so the rest of the 200 die a day from us hands? thats still too much senseless killing. or you are going to tell me all the deaths would have happened anyway if saddam was in charge

[Axeman]

were they actively killing each other in that scale before the us invaded? i think not. i don't agree with saddam's regime but he brought order to iraq. How many people have to die for this senseless shit. There is no real purpose for this war. you try to bring up the arguement about more than 300 die everyday from their own people. ok i give you that so the rest of the 200 die a day from us hands? thats still too much senseless killing. or you are going to tell me all the deaths would have happened anyway if saddam was in charge

think about what you said.....this shit that is going on in the middle east has been going on for hundreds of years, you cant stop the killings, granted our service men & women really need to get the hell out of there they dont belong there any longer. but you say "senseless killings" if someone is shooting at you are you telling me that you would'nt shoot back ??? i say bullshit !!! you would or you would die !! and dont forget how many people we have lost in this bullshit war.

[Tom Stall]

exactly. this war shouldn't have happened in the first place. none of the american servicemen that died in iraq wouldn't have died if we didn't invade in the first place. Ask yourself why are these people shooting at us? If a sovereign power invades the united states on the premise of liberating us. wouldn't some of us fight back? i also said that the killings with each other was never in the scale like it is now.

[Axeman]

exactly. this war shouldn't have happened in the first place. none of the american servicemen that died in iraq wouldn't have died if we didn't invade in the first place. Ask yourself why are these people shooting at us? If a sovereign power invades the united states on the premise of liberating us. wouldn't some of us fight back? i also said that the killings with each other was never in the scale like it is now.

if anyone invades the USA not only will they have an armed forces that is powerful but they will have atleast 40% of the united states civilians fighting against them, including myself ( i was in the army)and the same shit would be happening to them. so yeah i do know what you are saying.

[skunknuts[ADR]]

agreed to the posts above me

and they should torture this low life piece of shit

burn his arms with acid or cut off his toes one by one and shit

fuck that guy

[Andrew Dice Clay]

they should rack this muthafucka, maybe roast him semi alive, then peel his skin with a razor

[Sharkhunter]

Cut his hands off and his eyes out and put him in a room with a bunch of VERY HOT women in the buff and then tell him where he is

[Carl Emelianenko]

exactly. this war shouldn't have happened in the first place. none of the american servicemen that died in iraq wouldn't have died if we didn't invade in the first place. Ask yourself why are these people shooting at us? If a sovereign power invades the united states on the premise of liberating us. wouldn't some of us fight back? i also said that the killings with each other was never in the scale like it is now.

I often make the same point you do about how would we like a foreign power "liberating" us from our form of government?

Let's look at it this way. Was Saddam Hussein an asshole who killed large amounts of people? Yeah, he was. Did he prevent an even larger amount of people from dying? Yes, he did. Under Saddam, his country was kept strictly in check. He did something we cannot do now and we never will be able to do. He kept an extremely polarized country under his governance with minimal factional fighting. Look what happened once we gave the Iraqis freedom from their evil dictator; they killed their neighbors. Under Saddam, they were united in something. Most likely it was fear, which I'm not saying is a great way to live life. But I don't believe Saddam was an arbitrary murderer like Josef Stalin or Pol Pot. He knocked off political rivals and revolutionaries, just like our own CIA has done and continues to do. So the first point is, that with all his faults, Saddam was able to unite an extremely disjointed country and keep violence and crime under control.

Secondly, Saddam stabilized the entire Middle East. The ME is now the wild fuckin west (but in this case, east). Iraq especially has degenerated into it's old tribal ways. Iraq shouldn't even be a country, it was another example of ignorant Europeans (British) forming a country in an area they occupied. Without Saddam, that place would have formed it's own separate nations (a Kurdish nation, Shi'a nation, Sunni nation). Our all-knowing policy-makers, though, are living in a bubble and think we are going to unite these people. Wake the fuck up, you can't defeat religion. No matter how hard you try, you cannot stamp out something that is embeded in people's core value system. This grudge runs deep; 1300 year old feuds don't die because of us. Now that Iraq is no longer united under Saddam, a socialist (Ba'ath party) and secularist, the ME has become a prime target for the true problem: the Islamic Republic of Iran. When Saddam was in charge, he acted as a buffer between the Arab states and an ingluential and growing Iran. As we all know, he fought a long-ass, hardcore war with the Iranians that cost over 1,000,000 lives before they both decided they had enough. If anything, Saddam should have been our fucking ally against the crazy religious forces trying to set up Islamic governments all throughout the Middle East.

Now, however, this all seems inevitable. Iranian backed groups in Lebanon (Hezbollah), in Jordan, Syria, etc. are all gaining influence. Saddam couldn't take on the entire Middle East by himself, but him being in power could have bought us a lot of time and also given us a lot of leverage. But once again, we made a stupid mistake, in keeping with all the other major blunders of the past 50 years (Viet Nam, Iran-Contra, etc.)

[Carl Emelianenko]

Oh yeah, more on topic, I don't he should be executed. Then again, I don't support the death penalty in any case. I am not bloodthirsty, and don't subscribe to the barbaric eye-for-an-eye. The fact that al-Jazeera is airing this really disappoints me. Goes to show how backwards the whole Middle East is due to their exploitative religion and its leaders.