amanamagus
09-02-2008, 12:20 PM
Irrational numbers and complex numbers cannot be represented on a number line(Complex numbers can be represented on an argand diagram). These numbers cannot be represented without symbolic representations (like the bar to represent a non-terminating decimal and iota(i) to represent an imaginary or a complex number).
Imaginary numbers seem altogether absurd in the sense that no part of it(I dont know if there's any part) cannot be represented in the rational sense.
Number line, to me, represents a scale on which all rational numbers can be represented. But even there we cannot really pin point the absolute place of rational numbers. Complex numbers are said to exist in a separate plane altogether.
Till now, I dont think we have a proof that complex numbers have a real world existence. They are absurd as far as our intelligence/comprehension is concerned.
We cant even compute the value of pi(one of the most interesting numbers) till now absolutely.
What are the implications of these observations on mathematics? Does it hints on the need to change the language of mathematics from decimal system to some other system?
Can it lead us to believe that whole absolute truth cannot be expressed in rational terms or attained by rational thinking? Since it appears to be just a subset of the whole tangible truth.
Imaginary numbers seem altogether absurd in the sense that no part of it(I dont know if there's any part) cannot be represented in the rational sense.
Number line, to me, represents a scale on which all rational numbers can be represented. But even there we cannot really pin point the absolute place of rational numbers. Complex numbers are said to exist in a separate plane altogether.
Till now, I dont think we have a proof that complex numbers have a real world existence. They are absurd as far as our intelligence/comprehension is concerned.
We cant even compute the value of pi(one of the most interesting numbers) till now absolutely.
What are the implications of these observations on mathematics? Does it hints on the need to change the language of mathematics from decimal system to some other system?
Can it lead us to believe that whole absolute truth cannot be expressed in rational terms or attained by rational thinking? Since it appears to be just a subset of the whole tangible truth.