View Full Version : Europe set for debate rerun on ‘Frankenfoods’


kermitthefrayer
01-12-2008, 04:40 PM
Europe set for debate rerun on ‘Frankenfoods’

Andrew Bounds, Jeremy Grant and Clive Cookson
Financial Times
Saturday January 12, 2008

Europe is set for a rerun of the heated debate over genetically modified “Frankenfoods”, after regulators declared on Friday that meat and milk from cloned pigs and cows and their offspring were safe to eat.

The finding comes as GM foods are about to reignite trade friction between the US and European Union, with a deadline set to expire on Friday night by which the EU must comply with a World Trade Organisation ruling to allow imports of GM seeds.

While it could be years before meat and milk from cloned animals are on dinner plates in the EU, the European Food Safety Authority (Efsa) issued a “draft opinion” that such livestock and their products were as healthy and nutritious as their natural-born kin. “Healthy clones and healthy offspring do not show any significant differences from their conventional counterparts,” it said.

(Article continues below)

Efsa has invited views on its opinion before drawing up a definitive conclusion in May. Its deliberations come as the Food & Drug Agency in the US is expected to reach a final decision on the issue, possibly next week.

The developments would boost a handful of US biotechnology companies that have been working on cloning animals, mainly cattle, for the past four years. They say cloning would help farmers by increasing the availability of elite breeding stock.

Europe is already sharply divided over GM food, dubbed “Frankenfood” by opponents, with just one product – a pest-resistant maize – approved for cultivation. Austria and Hungary have banned even that and France is set to follow suit.

In the US, consumer acceptance of plant biotechnology in foods is high. Acceptance of biotechnologically altered animal produce is much lower, although a survey last year by the International Food Information Council showed that 61 per cent would purchase products derived from genetically engineered animals if they were FDA-approved.

In a sign of possible unprecedented congressional involvement in the process, Democratic senator Barbara Mikulski has called on the FDA to delay its final decision about cloning, pending further scientific tests. “We do not know enough about the long-term effects of introducing cloned animals, or their offspring, into our food supply. What’s the rush?” she asked.

Bruce Lee
01-12-2008, 05:05 PM
I pray for the day that the NWO outlaws frankenfoods. NWO > Monsanto.

hotnewton
01-12-2008, 06:08 PM
Frankenfoods don't kill people, eating Frankenfoods kill people

Rynoplasty
01-12-2008, 06:54 PM
Why used meat from cloned animals anyway? How is cloning a cow or pig cheaper than just letting them fuck or impregnating them?

hotnewton
01-12-2008, 07:30 PM
Why used meat from cloned animals anyway? How is cloning a cow or pig cheaper than just letting them fuck or impregnating them?

i think it's a time thing... animals can only produce so many offspring in a period of time.. labs can grow copious amounts of... sick

Rynoplasty
01-12-2008, 07:51 PM
i think it's a time thing... animals can only produce so many offspring in a period of time.. labs can grow copious amounts of... sick

But it is still going to take the time for the animal to grow. And they use artificial insemenation in animals all the time, why not just breed them more if the demand is that high?

kermitthefrayer
01-13-2008, 12:58 AM
I pray for the day that the NWO outlaws frankenfoods. NWO > Monsanto.

NWO=Monsanto

kermitthefrayer
01-13-2008, 01:02 AM
Frankenfoods don't kill people, eating Frankenfoods kill people

Monsanto's goal is to own the genetic code for all foods. While pushing for legislation that will allow only there foods to be approved by the FDA. For example if you are a liberated Iraqi farmer and you want seed you have to sign a contract that says you will only use Monsanto seed.

That and they have revolving door of employees between Monsanto and the FDA. Look into it or watch that codex alimentarius video I posted. Scary shit.

kermitthefrayer
01-13-2008, 01:03 AM
But it is still going to take the time for the animal to grow. And they use artificial insemenation in animals all the time, why not just breed them more if the demand is that high?


Exactly! Why????

jomomma
01-17-2008, 01:35 AM
from some of the things Ive seen we dont necessarily have a food shortage, we have problems with distribution and tariffs, import limits...market protection

in other words, poorer nations can provide wealthier nations food (or other products) more efficiently and thus cheaper for customers in those wealthier nations.

what kills it is the government subsidies from taxes keep people in power and their friends wealthy

Bruce Lee
01-18-2008, 01:13 AM
it's a population issue. the more food we produce and pass out, the more people breed. its a self perpetuating cycle that will never end until we devour the Earth, or the Earth purges us like the cancer we are.

deegs
01-18-2008, 10:57 PM
we need another plague, bruce.

InternetHero
01-25-2008, 03:32 PM
it's a population issue. the more food we produce and pass out, the more people breed. its a self perpetuating cycle that will never end until we devour the Earth, or the Earth purges us like the cancer we are.

I'm going to have like 10 kids just to pwn bitch-nature a little harder.