kermitthefrayer
12-29-2007, 04:45 PM
This is from another site, I am not the original writer of this post.
There is some redundancy here, because part 2 was also a response in a completely different thread.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=103047161#post103047161
Anti-Psychological Warfare class is in session
Quote
Originally Posted by frankenstein View Post
On a practical level, we may be overreacting to the Bill, however purposely vague language is always a bit scary. The slippery slope is steep with this one. Over time, I am positive this provision would be abused, with common sense thrown out the window, in order to quell opposition. Probably not right away. It would more likely be a slow motion move towards fascism.
It is too bad that there is no such thing as a college course called "Propaganda 101, and PsyOps/Psychological Warfare 101". The NWO is *extremely* intelligent. I am going to show you something that you might not have noticed before, what I am going to show you is how information is hidden in plain sight. There is a very subtle and devious trick that is used when writing legislation: conciliation through obfuscation.
What that means is this: It means that if they wrote the text in a clear, problem, solution format, the true intent of the bill would be too obvious to most people. So what they do is they diffuse their interpretations throughout the breadth of the text for how they want to define (or *redefine*) the meanings of words. This is how they lay the foundation for their tyranny.
This also avoids a significant amount of extra opposition that they would otherwise be inundated with. They KEY to seeing this is NOT READING/INTERPRETING THE BILL IN THE *ORDER* IT IS WRITTEN when determining its TRUE INTENT.
Below I will demonstrate exactly what I mean from a portion of the text of the bill itself.
Skipping subsection 3 for now for the sake of a more succinct and digestible illustration:
The normal ORDER people will read this bill, it's official layout.
`SEC. 899A. DEFINITIONS.
"`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change."
On the surface this is somewhat alarming, but it also includes a FAKE sense of "calming" reassurance--that the bill won't affect YOU because it says "for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence". You will think to yourself, that as long as you are not violent, that you have nothing to be concerned about whatsoever. Exactly like the propaganda that people believe in that says "If you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't oppose being searched, and forfeiting privacy rights."
The fact that it states this also subtly makes your brain acquiesce to the parts that are alarming, those being:
"The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system"
AND
"to advance political, religious, or social change."
Again, the beginning of this bill preemptively attacks your survival defense mechanisms, (both conscious and probably subconscious as well) innate desire for freedom, and desire to revolt against anything that would threaten your freedom, and unalienable rights. This first "definition" is the preface that assuages you into accepting the remainder of the entire highly treasonous legislation.
Now onto section 4, which will of course, be read after 2, and 3, we will discuss 3 near the end of this post.
`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.
Here the crafters of the bill step right in and waste no time to inject their desired definition of violence. NWO (Intelligencia at RAND Corporation, and I would suspect the Bilderberg Group) helped craft this, I seriously doubt Jane Harmon and Mr. Reichert wrote this themselves.
Your mind is already pre-conditioned to not get too upset about section 4 because of section 2, but now look at this:
REVERSING the order of reading (because that is how this is HID in plain sight).
`SEC. 899A. DEFINITIONS.
`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.
`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.
Dissection and analysis:
Subsection 4 internalized FIRST (excerpt):
"ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence"
Here they have declared that ALL FORCE IS ALSO VIOLENCE, FORCE CAN BE PEACEFUL, NOT ACCORDING TO THIS BILL, ALL FORCE IS NOW AUTOMATICALLY **VIOLENCE** THERE IS NO LONGER SUCH A THING AS A PEACEFUL PROTEST, ALL PROTEST PERIOD IS NOW TERRORISM, WHICH MEANS YOU CAN BE STRIPPED OF CITIZENSHIP, TORTURED, AND MURDERED FOR OPPOSING ANYTHING THE GOVT. DOES.
1st Amendment of The US Constitution, Bill of Rights:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Dissection and comparative in-depth analysis:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Exceprt of 1st Amendment of The US Constitution, Bill of Rights, truncated and conjoined for specific, focused clarity:
"Congress shall make no law respecting...the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Except of Subsection 2 of S.1959: "to advance political, religious, or social change."
Btw the term "ideologically based" is obfuscatory by design, if your not totally clear what it is you're reading, you'll be less likely to speak up about it and oppose it. Violence is violence-period, it is all illegal already.
Read Subsection 2 and read the 1st Amendment as many times as it takes until you understand.
Now onto Subsection 3
`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
Ok 1st off--Guess who the enemy is? It's US, but you thought it was Al-Qaeda like Fox, CNN, and all the Newspapers and Rush Limbaugh, Time Magazine (and all others) and Ann Coulter told you didn't you? You were wrong.
One could write many pages about this bill, I have tried to distill this down to reveal it's true overshadowing purpose, I will now succinctly break down only the last half of subsection 3, the 1st half should be rather self explanatory to most people.
Excerpt of Subsection 3 of S.1959:
"to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
Once again scroll up and read the 1st Amendment. What MAY not be obvious to you however is this. Let's REALLY break this down, line by treasonous line:
"to intimidate or coerce..."
I isolated this because it must be made clear that this acts as a prefix for ALL of the subsequent designations that the New World Order is deathly afraid of the build up of. Their criminality being fully exposed and actually peaceful indictments even have a chance of coming to fruition, (i.e. Ken Lay scenarios but with US Govt. officials) such as Impeachment of the current Executive Branch.
"the United States government"
Translation: The Bilderberg Group is getting extremely SICK and tired of you calling in harassing House Reps and Senators over the fact that they want to destroy your freedom and make you a slave. How dare you petition the Govt. by making phone calls, sending in faxes, email, et.al.
Once this becomes law, calling your Senator or Reps office to complain about a bill will be considered terrorism, and designate you with enemy combatant status (before that, you better bet your ass you will be on the NO FLY LIST)-WHETHER or not they carry out their new power against you at the time is beside the point, the foundation is being laid in FULL before they pull the plug.
"the civilian population of the United States"
Passing out Constitutional Fliers, passing out 9/11 truth DVD's, Alex Jones Films, et.al are now terrorism. It wasn't enough for them to make it illegal to peaceably assemble, or "to petition the government for a redress of grievances." They went balls to the wall and made it a crime to talk to your friends, and neighbors, warning them about the coming martial law. Warning them not to have their children poisoned with illegally enforced vaccinations filled with either dangerous levels of Ethyl Mercury and/or cancer viruses that will give them cancer later in life. You could write a book on how many things this very section will criminalize outright.
"in furtherance of political or social objectives."
So voting for and supporting Ron Paul, exposing the criminality of the Private Bank "Federal Pizza Delivery"--I mean "Federal Reserve", and IRS is now illegal, automatically VIOLENT even if peaceful, and also terrorism.
Definitions of "Force":
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=force&x=0&y=0
Definitions of "Violence":
http://dictionary.reference.com/sear...olence&x=0&y=0
The fact that later on the bill claims to not allow the govt. to violate your rights is a pathetic, sick joke.
Part 2: large excerpts from, including elements from the US Army propaganda manual that I found linked here, injected into this new analysis and modified based on my own interpolative reasoning
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6196911
"Another new BAE tool displayed in San Antonio was a program called GOSHAWK, which stands for "Geospatial Operations for a Secure Homeland -- Awareness, Workflow, Knowledge." It was pitched by BAE as a tool to help law enforcement and state and local emergency agencies prepare for, and respond to, "natural disasters and terrorist and criminal incidents."
Once again, no such thing as real terrorism in the U.S. Criminal incidents will be anyone violating S.1959, (i.e. just living a normal life exercising their unalienable rights).
"What better way to control the people and inspire fear? You are being monitored by private companies who will never be held accountable for mistakes or deliberate wrong doing because they and their activities are classified."
Yeah just like the KBR gang rapes.
"The mission of the Global Analysis unit, it says, "is to provide policymakers, warfighters, and law enforcement officials with analysts to help them understand the complex intelligence threats they face, and work force management programs to improve the skills and expertise of analysts.""
S.1959 excerpt
`SEC. 899B. FINDINGS.
"(6) The potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily prevented through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and requires the incorporation of State and local solutions."
"`(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."
Say goodbye to Internet "freedom" in the future. "broad and constant streams" translation: documentaries, talk radio like Alex Jones.
"`SEC. 899D. CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR THE STUDY OF VIOLENT RADICALIZATION AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM IN THE UNITED STATES.
`(2) use theories, methods and data from the social and behavioral sciences to better understand the origins, dynamics, and social and psychological aspects of violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism;"
Behavorial sciences, data--translation: Data including your FACIAL EXPRESSIONS from FACE SCANNING CAMERAS that will be everywhere, completely unavoidable. Mutter something under your breath, frowning too much? Welcome to prison.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
you forgot section 899E
`SEC. 899E. PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES WHILE PREVENTING IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM.
`(a) In General- In carrying out this subtitle, the Secretary shall ensure that the efforts of the Department to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism as described in this subtitle do not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.
`(b) Commitment to Racial Neutrality- The Secretary shall ensure that the activities and operations of the entities created by this subtitle are in compliance with the commitment of the Department to racial neutrality.
`(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department shall develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 899 the following:
lets just hope they don't change our civil liberties anytime soon.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
you forgot section 899E
`SEC. 899E. PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES WHILE PREVENTING IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM.
You cannot "prevent" something "IDEOLOGICALLY BASED" without inherently violating the 1st Amendment. Claiming to ensure protection of a right that you have to violate at the same time to achieve an objective is extremely carefully engineered Psy-Ops.
Ideology definition as it fits the context they are using:
1. the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group.
2. such a body of doctrine, myth, etc., with reference to some political and social plan, as that of fascism, along with the devices for putting it into operation.
1st Amendment protects Americans unalienable right to BELIEVE in anything they wish, they can uphold, procure, present, practice, make known/public, and disseminate ANY doctrine, belief, political, or social plan or suggestion (i.e. redress of grievances to the government) without fear or consequence, period--as long as it is "peaceful". They have craftily figured out a way to redefine the very premise of this, by obliterating it completely through extreme obfuscation.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
`(a) In General- In carrying out this subtitle, the Secretary shall ensure that the efforts of the Department to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism as described in this subtitle do not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.
Non Sequitur, Inconsistency: Assertion that contrary or contradictory statements are both true (preventing ideologically based violence innately violates the rights it is claiming will be guarded against violation), psy-ops.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
`(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department shall develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.'.
Yeah I have confidence in whatever Bilderberg approved Schmuck is going to fill this bullshit position. "DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT" ACCORDING TO WHOM AND BY WHAT LIMITS, AND WHO HAS OVERSIGHT OVER THIS INDIVIDUAL? "without a rational basis" again, subject to their own interpretation, desires.
WE had an A.G. that snaked his way out of firing 8 U.S. attorneys, all masked over with a staged school shooting to de-emphasize attention to it, and we're expected to trust a so-called "Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer"? Is this guy going to have dual-citizenship like the devil (literal translation of Chertoff) Ministry of HS "secretary"?
I don't recall the US Constitution calling for an individual to be delegated for the entire country to be empowered with telling us what the Constitution means and what it does and does not apply to. Does the "Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer" take precedence over the United States Supreme Court? Care to take a stab at that one?
If the Founding Fathers were alive today, everyone at DHS would be executed and their heads would be put up on sharp poles for a reminder to what happens when you bring TREASON TO AMERICA.
Do you realize that this bill would have made the Boston Tea Party a terrorist act?
"`SEC. 899A. DEFINITIONS.
`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change."
Who's defining WHAT an "extremist belief system" is? 9/11 is an inside job an extremist belief system? You better believe this is the main reason for this bill. "advance political, religious, or social change." THAT'S OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHT.
WE can VOTE and promote whoever we want for president, people can preach on the streets and/or witness door to door. People can protest gay marches, abortions, illegal wars, as long as they do not physically harm anyone. This bill gives them the POWER to infringe ANY and all of these things AT WILL against whatever segment of society they wish, period. More proof:
"...the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence...to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
THAT'S OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHT--except without violence, it says FORCE OR VIOLENCE, they are not the same, a peaceful protest is FORCE but is non-violent, to them all force can be now labeled violence without limitation.
"to intimidate or coerce the United States government",
Calling your House Rep or Senator and complaining about an unconstitutional bill (amnesty) and threatening not to vote for them is a form of intimidation and coercion which is now illegal under this bill and could subject you to arrest.
"the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof,"
This means that it's now a crime to hand a copy of Zeitgeist, Endgame, Terrorstorm 2nd Edition to your next door neighboor, co-worker, police officer, librarian, et.al. It also means it is now a crime for anyone to witness door to door for Christ, because they are now guilty of attempting "to intimidate or coerce the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof,".
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
lets just hope they don't change our civil liberties anytime soon.
They don't have to do that, this bill bypasses them and creates the illusion of of harmlessness at the same time, as was required to mitigate an extremely massive protest the likes of the amnesty bill that the American People shot the hell down and pissed Chertoff and DHS the hell off.
Remember even if you do not carry anything out, merely planning it or threatening to do anything is a crime. They have created pre-crimes, which is unconstitutional in and of itself because it conveniently bypasses the pesky constraints of DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
`(b) Commitment to Racial Neutrality- The Secretary shall ensure that the activities and operations of the entities created by this subtitle are in compliance with the commitment of the Department to racial neutrality.
"`SEC. 899B. FINDINGS.
`The Congress finds the following:
7) Individuals prone to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence span all races, ethnicities, and religious beliefs, and individuals should not be targeted based solely on race, ethnicity, or religion."
Solely means only, in other words will include race, ethnicity, or religion (it effectively says "not only based on") in addition to the 1st Amendment violation where they can decide what YOU believe is an "extremist belief system".
The if Bill was not an outright lie, for this specific illustration, it would be worded as such:
7) Individuals prone to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence span all races, ethnicities, and religious beliefs, and individuals shall not be targeted based on race, ethnicity, or religion.
The word solely alone completely changes the entire meaning of this paragraph, and the entire Bill. Notice it also says SHOULD not, instead of SHALL or WILL not, big difference.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"`(2) The promotion of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence exists in the United States and poses a threat to homeland security."
*POSES A THREAT TO HOMELAND SECURITY*? NOTICE WHAT IT DOES NOT SAY: It does not say "poses a threat to the United States", "poses a threat to the American People", "poses a threat to freedom".
The following apply to the entire bill:
Causal Fallacies
Assertion. Assertions are positive statements presented as fact. They imply that what is stated is self-evident and needs no further proof. Assertions may or may not be true.
Vagueness. Generalities are deliberately vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations. The intention is to move the audience by use of undefined phrases, without analyzing their validity or attempting to determine their reasonableness or application.
Guilt by association: Guilt by association links a person, group, or idea to other persons, groups, or ideas repugnant to the target audience. The insinuation is that the connection is not mutual, accidental, or superficial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fallacies of Explanation
* Subverted support: The phenomenon being explained doesn't exist.
* Non-support: Evidence for the phenomenon being explained is biased:
"`(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fallacies of Ambiguity
Reverse Equivocation/Fallacies of Distraction: Use two terms with multiple different meanings, where both CAN be similar but yet different at the same time. Unrelated points conjoined as a single proposition.
"`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force *or*
violence..."
Emphasis mine. I hope you now understand, we are in extremely serious trouble. DHS is the only thing talked about being protected in this bill, NOT AMERICA.
DHS is THE SS HEADQUARTERS for MARTIAL LAW, and they WILL BE DAMNED IF THEY ARE OPPOSED IN ANY WAY. They are so afraid that they are now going to use Space Satellites against us.
The massacre that happened in Iraq will happen here, Blackwater already has at least one domestic contract now in the US, they are coming home, they will be used along with foreign Mexican troops to quell domestic unrest. But first their presence will be sold to us and acceptance will settle in as they pretend to fight the war on drugs, replete with actual busts to legitimize them and give them fake credibility, when they then turn and stab us in the back.
EXECUTE ORDER 66
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/09n0qd_n4c0&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/09n0qd_n4c0&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
There is some redundancy here, because part 2 was also a response in a completely different thread.
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?p=103047161#post103047161
Anti-Psychological Warfare class is in session
Quote
Originally Posted by frankenstein View Post
On a practical level, we may be overreacting to the Bill, however purposely vague language is always a bit scary. The slippery slope is steep with this one. Over time, I am positive this provision would be abused, with common sense thrown out the window, in order to quell opposition. Probably not right away. It would more likely be a slow motion move towards fascism.
It is too bad that there is no such thing as a college course called "Propaganda 101, and PsyOps/Psychological Warfare 101". The NWO is *extremely* intelligent. I am going to show you something that you might not have noticed before, what I am going to show you is how information is hidden in plain sight. There is a very subtle and devious trick that is used when writing legislation: conciliation through obfuscation.
What that means is this: It means that if they wrote the text in a clear, problem, solution format, the true intent of the bill would be too obvious to most people. So what they do is they diffuse their interpretations throughout the breadth of the text for how they want to define (or *redefine*) the meanings of words. This is how they lay the foundation for their tyranny.
This also avoids a significant amount of extra opposition that they would otherwise be inundated with. They KEY to seeing this is NOT READING/INTERPRETING THE BILL IN THE *ORDER* IT IS WRITTEN when determining its TRUE INTENT.
Below I will demonstrate exactly what I mean from a portion of the text of the bill itself.
Skipping subsection 3 for now for the sake of a more succinct and digestible illustration:
The normal ORDER people will read this bill, it's official layout.
`SEC. 899A. DEFINITIONS.
"`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change."
On the surface this is somewhat alarming, but it also includes a FAKE sense of "calming" reassurance--that the bill won't affect YOU because it says "for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence". You will think to yourself, that as long as you are not violent, that you have nothing to be concerned about whatsoever. Exactly like the propaganda that people believe in that says "If you have nothing to hide, then you shouldn't oppose being searched, and forfeiting privacy rights."
The fact that it states this also subtly makes your brain acquiesce to the parts that are alarming, those being:
"The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system"
AND
"to advance political, religious, or social change."
Again, the beginning of this bill preemptively attacks your survival defense mechanisms, (both conscious and probably subconscious as well) innate desire for freedom, and desire to revolt against anything that would threaten your freedom, and unalienable rights. This first "definition" is the preface that assuages you into accepting the remainder of the entire highly treasonous legislation.
Now onto section 4, which will of course, be read after 2, and 3, we will discuss 3 near the end of this post.
`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.
Here the crafters of the bill step right in and waste no time to inject their desired definition of violence. NWO (Intelligencia at RAND Corporation, and I would suspect the Bilderberg Group) helped craft this, I seriously doubt Jane Harmon and Mr. Reichert wrote this themselves.
Your mind is already pre-conditioned to not get too upset about section 4 because of section 2, but now look at this:
REVERSING the order of reading (because that is how this is HID in plain sight).
`SEC. 899A. DEFINITIONS.
`(4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.
`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.
Dissection and analysis:
Subsection 4 internalized FIRST (excerpt):
"ideologically based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence"
Here they have declared that ALL FORCE IS ALSO VIOLENCE, FORCE CAN BE PEACEFUL, NOT ACCORDING TO THIS BILL, ALL FORCE IS NOW AUTOMATICALLY **VIOLENCE** THERE IS NO LONGER SUCH A THING AS A PEACEFUL PROTEST, ALL PROTEST PERIOD IS NOW TERRORISM, WHICH MEANS YOU CAN BE STRIPPED OF CITIZENSHIP, TORTURED, AND MURDERED FOR OPPOSING ANYTHING THE GOVT. DOES.
1st Amendment of The US Constitution, Bill of Rights:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Dissection and comparative in-depth analysis:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Exceprt of 1st Amendment of The US Constitution, Bill of Rights, truncated and conjoined for specific, focused clarity:
"Congress shall make no law respecting...the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Except of Subsection 2 of S.1959: "to advance political, religious, or social change."
Btw the term "ideologically based" is obfuscatory by design, if your not totally clear what it is you're reading, you'll be less likely to speak up about it and oppose it. Violence is violence-period, it is all illegal already.
Read Subsection 2 and read the 1st Amendment as many times as it takes until you understand.
Now onto Subsection 3
`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence by a group or individual born, raised, or based and operating primarily within the United States or any possession of the United States to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.
Ok 1st off--Guess who the enemy is? It's US, but you thought it was Al-Qaeda like Fox, CNN, and all the Newspapers and Rush Limbaugh, Time Magazine (and all others) and Ann Coulter told you didn't you? You were wrong.
One could write many pages about this bill, I have tried to distill this down to reveal it's true overshadowing purpose, I will now succinctly break down only the last half of subsection 3, the 1st half should be rather self explanatory to most people.
Excerpt of Subsection 3 of S.1959:
"to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
Once again scroll up and read the 1st Amendment. What MAY not be obvious to you however is this. Let's REALLY break this down, line by treasonous line:
"to intimidate or coerce..."
I isolated this because it must be made clear that this acts as a prefix for ALL of the subsequent designations that the New World Order is deathly afraid of the build up of. Their criminality being fully exposed and actually peaceful indictments even have a chance of coming to fruition, (i.e. Ken Lay scenarios but with US Govt. officials) such as Impeachment of the current Executive Branch.
"the United States government"
Translation: The Bilderberg Group is getting extremely SICK and tired of you calling in harassing House Reps and Senators over the fact that they want to destroy your freedom and make you a slave. How dare you petition the Govt. by making phone calls, sending in faxes, email, et.al.
Once this becomes law, calling your Senator or Reps office to complain about a bill will be considered terrorism, and designate you with enemy combatant status (before that, you better bet your ass you will be on the NO FLY LIST)-WHETHER or not they carry out their new power against you at the time is beside the point, the foundation is being laid in FULL before they pull the plug.
"the civilian population of the United States"
Passing out Constitutional Fliers, passing out 9/11 truth DVD's, Alex Jones Films, et.al are now terrorism. It wasn't enough for them to make it illegal to peaceably assemble, or "to petition the government for a redress of grievances." They went balls to the wall and made it a crime to talk to your friends, and neighbors, warning them about the coming martial law. Warning them not to have their children poisoned with illegally enforced vaccinations filled with either dangerous levels of Ethyl Mercury and/or cancer viruses that will give them cancer later in life. You could write a book on how many things this very section will criminalize outright.
"in furtherance of political or social objectives."
So voting for and supporting Ron Paul, exposing the criminality of the Private Bank "Federal Pizza Delivery"--I mean "Federal Reserve", and IRS is now illegal, automatically VIOLENT even if peaceful, and also terrorism.
Definitions of "Force":
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=force&x=0&y=0
Definitions of "Violence":
http://dictionary.reference.com/sear...olence&x=0&y=0
The fact that later on the bill claims to not allow the govt. to violate your rights is a pathetic, sick joke.
Part 2: large excerpts from, including elements from the US Army propaganda manual that I found linked here, injected into this new analysis and modified based on my own interpolative reasoning
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=6196911
"Another new BAE tool displayed in San Antonio was a program called GOSHAWK, which stands for "Geospatial Operations for a Secure Homeland -- Awareness, Workflow, Knowledge." It was pitched by BAE as a tool to help law enforcement and state and local emergency agencies prepare for, and respond to, "natural disasters and terrorist and criminal incidents."
Once again, no such thing as real terrorism in the U.S. Criminal incidents will be anyone violating S.1959, (i.e. just living a normal life exercising their unalienable rights).
"What better way to control the people and inspire fear? You are being monitored by private companies who will never be held accountable for mistakes or deliberate wrong doing because they and their activities are classified."
Yeah just like the KBR gang rapes.
"The mission of the Global Analysis unit, it says, "is to provide policymakers, warfighters, and law enforcement officials with analysts to help them understand the complex intelligence threats they face, and work force management programs to improve the skills and expertise of analysts.""
S.1959 excerpt
`SEC. 899B. FINDINGS.
"(6) The potential rise of self radicalized, unaffiliated terrorists domestically cannot be easily prevented through traditional Federal intelligence or law enforcement efforts, and requires the incorporation of State and local solutions."
"`(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."
Say goodbye to Internet "freedom" in the future. "broad and constant streams" translation: documentaries, talk radio like Alex Jones.
"`SEC. 899D. CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR THE STUDY OF VIOLENT RADICALIZATION AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM IN THE UNITED STATES.
`(2) use theories, methods and data from the social and behavioral sciences to better understand the origins, dynamics, and social and psychological aspects of violent radicalization and homegrown terrorism;"
Behavorial sciences, data--translation: Data including your FACIAL EXPRESSIONS from FACE SCANNING CAMERAS that will be everywhere, completely unavoidable. Mutter something under your breath, frowning too much? Welcome to prison.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
you forgot section 899E
`SEC. 899E. PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES WHILE PREVENTING IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM.
`(a) In General- In carrying out this subtitle, the Secretary shall ensure that the efforts of the Department to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism as described in this subtitle do not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.
`(b) Commitment to Racial Neutrality- The Secretary shall ensure that the activities and operations of the entities created by this subtitle are in compliance with the commitment of the Department to racial neutrality.
`(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department shall develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 899 the following:
lets just hope they don't change our civil liberties anytime soon.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
you forgot section 899E
`SEC. 899E. PROTECTING CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES WHILE PREVENTING IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE AND HOMEGROWN TERRORISM.
You cannot "prevent" something "IDEOLOGICALLY BASED" without inherently violating the 1st Amendment. Claiming to ensure protection of a right that you have to violate at the same time to achieve an objective is extremely carefully engineered Psy-Ops.
Ideology definition as it fits the context they are using:
1. the body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group.
2. such a body of doctrine, myth, etc., with reference to some political and social plan, as that of fascism, along with the devices for putting it into operation.
1st Amendment protects Americans unalienable right to BELIEVE in anything they wish, they can uphold, procure, present, practice, make known/public, and disseminate ANY doctrine, belief, political, or social plan or suggestion (i.e. redress of grievances to the government) without fear or consequence, period--as long as it is "peaceful". They have craftily figured out a way to redefine the very premise of this, by obliterating it completely through extreme obfuscation.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
`(a) In General- In carrying out this subtitle, the Secretary shall ensure that the efforts of the Department to prevent ideologically based violence and homegrown terrorism as described in this subtitle do not violate the constitutional rights, civil rights, and civil liberties of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents.
Non Sequitur, Inconsistency: Assertion that contrary or contradictory statements are both true (preventing ideologically based violence innately violates the rights it is claiming will be guarded against violation), psy-ops.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
`(c) Auditing Mechanism- The Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer of the Department shall develop and implement an auditing mechanism to ensure that compliance with this subtitle does not result in a disproportionate impact, without a rational basis, on any particular race, ethnicity, or religion and include the results of its audit in its annual report to Congress required under section 705.'.
Yeah I have confidence in whatever Bilderberg approved Schmuck is going to fill this bullshit position. "DISPROPORTIONATE IMPACT" ACCORDING TO WHOM AND BY WHAT LIMITS, AND WHO HAS OVERSIGHT OVER THIS INDIVIDUAL? "without a rational basis" again, subject to their own interpretation, desires.
WE had an A.G. that snaked his way out of firing 8 U.S. attorneys, all masked over with a staged school shooting to de-emphasize attention to it, and we're expected to trust a so-called "Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer"? Is this guy going to have dual-citizenship like the devil (literal translation of Chertoff) Ministry of HS "secretary"?
I don't recall the US Constitution calling for an individual to be delegated for the entire country to be empowered with telling us what the Constitution means and what it does and does not apply to. Does the "Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Officer" take precedence over the United States Supreme Court? Care to take a stab at that one?
If the Founding Fathers were alive today, everyone at DHS would be executed and their heads would be put up on sharp poles for a reminder to what happens when you bring TREASON TO AMERICA.
Do you realize that this bill would have made the Boston Tea Party a terrorist act?
"`SEC. 899A. DEFINITIONS.
`(2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change."
Who's defining WHAT an "extremist belief system" is? 9/11 is an inside job an extremist belief system? You better believe this is the main reason for this bill. "advance political, religious, or social change." THAT'S OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHT.
WE can VOTE and promote whoever we want for president, people can preach on the streets and/or witness door to door. People can protest gay marches, abortions, illegal wars, as long as they do not physically harm anyone. This bill gives them the POWER to infringe ANY and all of these things AT WILL against whatever segment of society they wish, period. More proof:
"...the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force or violence...to intimidate or coerce the United States government, the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives."
THAT'S OUR UNALIENABLE RIGHT--except without violence, it says FORCE OR VIOLENCE, they are not the same, a peaceful protest is FORCE but is non-violent, to them all force can be now labeled violence without limitation.
"to intimidate or coerce the United States government",
Calling your House Rep or Senator and complaining about an unconstitutional bill (amnesty) and threatening not to vote for them is a form of intimidation and coercion which is now illegal under this bill and could subject you to arrest.
"the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof,"
This means that it's now a crime to hand a copy of Zeitgeist, Endgame, Terrorstorm 2nd Edition to your next door neighboor, co-worker, police officer, librarian, et.al. It also means it is now a crime for anyone to witness door to door for Christ, because they are now guilty of attempting "to intimidate or coerce the civilian population of the United States, or any segment thereof,".
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
lets just hope they don't change our civil liberties anytime soon.
They don't have to do that, this bill bypasses them and creates the illusion of of harmlessness at the same time, as was required to mitigate an extremely massive protest the likes of the amnesty bill that the American People shot the hell down and pissed Chertoff and DHS the hell off.
Remember even if you do not carry anything out, merely planning it or threatening to do anything is a crime. They have created pre-crimes, which is unconstitutional in and of itself because it conveniently bypasses the pesky constraints of DUE PROCESS OF LAW.
Quote
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen View Post
`(b) Commitment to Racial Neutrality- The Secretary shall ensure that the activities and operations of the entities created by this subtitle are in compliance with the commitment of the Department to racial neutrality.
"`SEC. 899B. FINDINGS.
`The Congress finds the following:
7) Individuals prone to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence span all races, ethnicities, and religious beliefs, and individuals should not be targeted based solely on race, ethnicity, or religion."
Solely means only, in other words will include race, ethnicity, or religion (it effectively says "not only based on") in addition to the 1st Amendment violation where they can decide what YOU believe is an "extremist belief system".
The if Bill was not an outright lie, for this specific illustration, it would be worded as such:
7) Individuals prone to violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence span all races, ethnicities, and religious beliefs, and individuals shall not be targeted based on race, ethnicity, or religion.
The word solely alone completely changes the entire meaning of this paragraph, and the entire Bill. Notice it also says SHOULD not, instead of SHALL or WILL not, big difference.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"`(2) The promotion of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism, and ideologically based violence exists in the United States and poses a threat to homeland security."
*POSES A THREAT TO HOMELAND SECURITY*? NOTICE WHAT IT DOES NOT SAY: It does not say "poses a threat to the United States", "poses a threat to the American People", "poses a threat to freedom".
The following apply to the entire bill:
Causal Fallacies
Assertion. Assertions are positive statements presented as fact. They imply that what is stated is self-evident and needs no further proof. Assertions may or may not be true.
Vagueness. Generalities are deliberately vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations. The intention is to move the audience by use of undefined phrases, without analyzing their validity or attempting to determine their reasonableness or application.
Guilt by association: Guilt by association links a person, group, or idea to other persons, groups, or ideas repugnant to the target audience. The insinuation is that the connection is not mutual, accidental, or superficial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fallacies of Explanation
* Subverted support: The phenomenon being explained doesn't exist.
* Non-support: Evidence for the phenomenon being explained is biased:
"`(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fallacies of Ambiguity
Reverse Equivocation/Fallacies of Distraction: Use two terms with multiple different meanings, where both CAN be similar but yet different at the same time. Unrelated points conjoined as a single proposition.
"`(3) HOMEGROWN TERRORISM- The term `homegrown terrorism' means the use, planned use, or threatened use, of force *or*
violence..."
Emphasis mine. I hope you now understand, we are in extremely serious trouble. DHS is the only thing talked about being protected in this bill, NOT AMERICA.
DHS is THE SS HEADQUARTERS for MARTIAL LAW, and they WILL BE DAMNED IF THEY ARE OPPOSED IN ANY WAY. They are so afraid that they are now going to use Space Satellites against us.
The massacre that happened in Iraq will happen here, Blackwater already has at least one domestic contract now in the US, they are coming home, they will be used along with foreign Mexican troops to quell domestic unrest. But first their presence will be sold to us and acceptance will settle in as they pretend to fight the war on drugs, replete with actual busts to legitimize them and give them fake credibility, when they then turn and stab us in the back.
EXECUTE ORDER 66
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/09n0qd_n4c0&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/09n0qd_n4c0&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>