<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/klSek88t54w&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/klSek88t54w&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
Where is that speech from in the beginning? Oh...watch the whole vid!

Ron Paul won't win because his followers are unable to form their own thoughts and articulate them. Supporters of other candidates engage in actual discourse, an exchange of thoughts and ideas- Ron Paul followers are incapable of this and instead do nothing but post YoutubeVideos or other peoples words to serve as theirs... It's the ultimate display of brainwashing.

"your mind has been under attack..." is correct.

"you're in trouble because you people are sitting here listening to me right now. Less than 3% of you people read books, because less than 15% of you read newspapers, because the only truth you know is what you get through this (you)tube... THIS TUBE IS THE GOSPEL, THE ULTIMATE REVELATION!!!!"

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! I love irony.

So who would you vote for other than Ron Paul?

So who would you vote for other than Ron Paul?

Ron Paul represents a FAR more palatable form of Conservatism than the neo-cons- and ALOT of what he says about forigen policy and the drug war I agree with 100%. He has a lot of outdated ideas on the free-market (outdated as in, it's not 1781 anymore), and the size of government, but he's got some good ideas (if you read my posts you'll see I have a problem with Ron Paul supporters who try and tie the Occult and Satan and Freemasons into some global CT that only Ron can save us from, but Ron Paul I don't mind that much).

I'm a filthy liberal Green Party member who votes for Ralph Nader. This time around I'd give my vote to John Edwards over anyone else.

But even my boy Ralph said he might vote for Ron because he would be "an enema to government" and I don't totally disagree. I do believe our government is so bloated and out of control that we might as well just start from scratch. Ron Paul would be that guy.

Ron Paul represents a FAR more palatable form of Conservatism than the neo-cons- and ALOT of what he says about forigen policy and the drug war I agree with 100%. He has a lot of outdated ideas on the free-market (outdated as in, it's not 1781 anymore), and the size of government, but he's got some good ideas (if you read my posts you'll see I have a problem with Ron Paul supporters who try and tie the Occult and Satan and Freemasons into some global CT that only Ron can save us from, but Ron Paul I don't mind that much).

I'm a filthy liberal Green Party member who votes for Ralph Nader. This time around I'd give my vote to John Edwards over anyone else.

But even my boy Ralph said he might vote for Ron because he would be "an enema to government" and I don't totally disagree. I do believe our government is so bloated and out of control that we might as well just start from scratch. Ron Paul would be that guy.

Ok I can see where you're coming from, I don't really like all the conspiracy theories that seem to follow Ron Paul either. But I do agree with him more so than other candidates.

I see Ron Paul as a medium that doesn't just side with fellow conservatives because he's a conservative. I like the idea of the Federal governement being used more so to unite the states than to rule them. I like his foreign policy and I like how he has an understanding of islamic extremist definately more so than people like Giuliani.


So I stick by him and I'm not about to turn down any supporters just because they have some ideas I find irrational.

Edwards isn't a bad choice though I like him best out of the Democrats.

How can you pick Edwards yet and CFR front man... How can you say you are against facism support yet support the CFR?

How can you pick Edwards yet and CFR front man... How can you say you are against facism support yet support the CFR?

You just don't get it. The biggest conspiracy in the world is that Edwards is part of the CFR. Obviously the subliminal images from the mainstream media have given you this false perception. You need to drink a pint of turkey blood and throw salt over your shoulder (but not in the presense of a woman or black cat)-and then you will TRUELY know the truth.

Also, I uncovered an ancient, secret Freemason document that has some small print (unnoticed by those who haven't drank the Turkey Blood) and it clearly states that Nostradomus and Rasputin (along with Aaron Burr) all predicted that Edwards would be railroaded by those purporting to be Freemasons.

My children are being plank walked into tax slavery and you don't even know the truth about Edwards? I thought you were a Sentinal for Freedom? Psssssssss!

werd, im drinking a pint of turkey blood as we speak.

You just don't get it. The biggest conspiracy in the world is that Edwards is part of the CFR. Obviously the subliminal images from the mainstream media have given you this false perception. You need to drink a pint of turkey blood and throw salt over your shoulder (but not in the presense of a woman or black cat)-and then you will TRUELY know the truth.

Also, I uncovered an ancient, secret Freemason document that has some small print (unnoticed by those who haven't drank the Turkey Blood) and it clearly states that Nostradomus and Rasputin (along with Aaron Burr) all predicted that Edwards would be railroaded by those purporting to be Freemasons.

My children are being plank walked into tax slavery and you don't even know the truth about Edwards? I thought you were a Sentinal for Freedom? Psssssssss!

Insult me all you want you still avoided answering my question. Why would you support Edwards if he is clearly a shill for an organization fully funded and run by David Rockefeller and friends?

I thought you were against one world government?


"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

I thought you were against one world government?






Yeah right, a liberal against big government thats a good one. Don't you know its for our own good?

Yeah right, a liberal against big government thats a good one. Don't you know its for our own good?

Of course just like Universal health care and mandatory doctor visits and psychiatric screening for mental health disorders!


WAR is PEACE!!!

2+2=5

Of course just like Universal health care and mandatory doctor visits and psychiatric screening for mental health disorders!


WAR is PEACE!!!

2+2=5

Kermit chill out on the 1984 it's a good book but damn.

National government concerns:
1. Military
2. Health Care
3. Diplomacy

State government concerns:
1. The Economy
2. everything else.