View Full Version : ufc.com
Ggallaz
05-27-2007, 06:43 AM
I found this funny since it says Chuck got ownd at UFC 71 but they have yet to boot Liddell and replace him with THE LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION QUENTIN "RAMPAGE" JACKSON!!!!! Wonder when they will update it.
http://www.ufc.com/index.cfm?fa=fighter.TitleHolders&cid=3
Blunt Object
05-27-2007, 06:47 AM
although you places this in the spoiler forum your title is not that good
djboricuaz
05-27-2007, 06:54 AM
I saw that shit!!!
Ggallaz
05-27-2007, 06:58 AM
although you places this in the spoiler forum your title is not that good
I am not getting you...do you mean the title is misleading?
it was stopped early
Rampage looked like he had his number in the stand up though.........sort of
great, now we get another rematch
powdap
05-27-2007, 07:11 AM
it was stopped early
Rampage looked like he had his number in the stand up though.........sort of
great, now we get another rematch
exaxctly. the ref should of let it go so chuck would have left in a coffin. :gojerkit:
Neo_Pop
05-27-2007, 07:13 AM
Chuck was stiff. If the ref wouldn't have stopped it, Chuck's corner would have had to throw the towel, again.
exaxctly. the ref should of let it go so chuck would have left in a coffin. :gojerkit:
Like I give a fuck, I want to see a beatdown
I just watched it again, Rampage had his number in the stand up battle BIG TIME
The punch that dropped Chuck looked like something Tyson used to throw
still would have liked to see it go on a little longer
powdap
05-27-2007, 07:20 AM
Like I give a fuck, I want to see a beatdown
.............like i said
Blunt Object
05-27-2007, 07:57 AM
I am not getting you...do you mean the title is misleading?
it's contradicting with the act of putting it in the spoiler forum because the title implys that chuck lost
Ggallaz
05-27-2007, 08:24 AM
it's contradicting with the act of putting it in the spoiler forum because the title implys that chuck lost
D00D, he totally did lose. That was the point. That is the whole reason I put it in the spoiler forum because Chuck lost.
He means from the forum index you can see the thread title, dont worry I changed it
back to the fight convo
Blunt Object
05-27-2007, 08:36 AM
He means from the forum index you can see the thread title, dont worry I changed it
back to the fight convo
:correct::correct::correct:
hotnewton
05-27-2007, 08:43 AM
I thought live events were fair game... and weren't considered spoilers (except for the unnaired prelims)
either way I am happy that they are considered spoilers even though they are live because I got to watch the Salmon fight before knowing who won and if I ever miss an event I don't have to worry
there wont be considered spoilers
tomorrow.....I havent even seen all the fights yet, rapidshare makes you wait
FlashKO
06-25-2007, 02:48 AM
If it had of gone on any longer it would have gotten much much worse
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.