View Full Version : Eleven Philisophical Questions


amanamagus
04-30-2007, 03:21 AM
I obviously didn't write this, but it is very interesting...

Interesting Read

From:http://www.neatorama.com/2007/02/06/11-most-important-philosophical-quotations/

1. "The unexamined life is not worth living" – Socrates (470-399 BCE)Socrates' belief that we must reflect upon the life we live was partly inspired by the famous phrase inscribed at the shrine of the oracle at Delphi, "Know thyself." The key to finding value in the prophecies of the oracle was self-knowledge, not a decoder ring.Socrates felt so passionately about the value of self-examination that he closely examined not only his own beliefs and values but those of others as well. More precisely, through his relentless questioning, he forced people to examine their own beliefs. He saw the citizens of his beloved Athens sleepwalking through life, living only for money, power, and fame, so he became famous trying to help them.

2. "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily" – William of Ockham (1285 - 1349?)Commonly known as Ockham's razor, the idea here is that in judging among competing philosophical or scientific theories, all other things being equal, we should prefer the simplest theory. Scientists currently speak of four forces in the universe: gravity, the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force. Ockham would certainly nod approvingly at the ongoing attempt to formulate a grand unified theory, a single force that encompasses all four.The ultimate irony of Ockham's razor may be that some have used it to prove God is unnecessary to the explanation of the universe, an idea Ockham the Franciscan priest would reject.

3. "The life of man [is] solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." – Thomas Hobbes (1588 – 1679)Referring to the original state of nature, a hypothetical past before civilization, Hobbes [wiki] saw no reason to be nostalgic.Whereas Rousseau said, "Man is born free, and he is everywhere in chains," Hobbes believed we find ourselves living a savage, impossible life without education and the protection of the state. Human nature is bad: we'll prey on one another in the most vicious ways. No doubt the state imposes on our liberty in an overwhelming way. Yet Hobbes' claim was that these very chains were absolutely crucial in protecting us from one another.

4. "I think therefore I am" – Ren.. Descartes (1596 – 1650)Descartes [wiki] began his philosophy by doubting everything in order to figure out what he could know with absolute certainty. Although he could be wrong about what he was thinking, that he was thinking was undeniable. Upon the recognition that "I think," Descartes concluded that "I am."On the heels of believing in himself, Descartes asked, What am I? His answer: a thinking thing (res cogitans) as opposed to a physical thing extended in three-dimensional space (res extensa). So, based on this line, Descartes knew he existed, though he wasn't sure if he had a body. It's a philosophical cliff-hanger; you'll have to read Meditations to find out how it ends.

5. "To be is to be perceived (Esse est percipi)." Or, "If a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?" – Bishop George Berkeley (1685 – 1753)As an idealist, Berkeley [wiki] believed that nothing is real but minds and their ideas. Ideas do not exist independently of minds. Through a complicated and flawed line of reasoning he concluded that "to be is to be perceived." Something exists only if someone has the idea of it.Though he never put the question in the exact words of the famous quotation, Berkeley would say that if a tree fell in the forest and there was no one (not even a squirrel) there to hear it, not only would it not make a sound, but there would be no tree.The good news is, according to Berkeley, that the mind of God always perceives everything. So the tree will always make a sound, and there's no need to worry about blipping out of existence if you fall asleep in a room by yourself.

6. "We live in the best of all possible worlds." – Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716)Voltaire's famous novel Candide satirizes this optimistic view. And looking around you right now you may wonder how anyone could actually believe it. But Leibniz [wiki] believed that before creation God contemplated every possible way the universe could be and chose to create the one in which we live because it's the best.The principle of sufficient reason holds that for everything, there must be sufficient reason why it exists. And according to Leibniz the only sufficient reason for the world we live in is that God created it as the best possible universe. God could have created a universe in which no one ever did wrong, in which there was no human evil, but that would require humans to be deprived of the gift of free wills and thus would not be the best possible world.

7. "The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk." G.W.F. Hegel (1770 – 1831)Similar to "vision is 20/20 in hindsight," Hegel's [wiki] poetic insight says that philosophers are impotent. Only after the end of an age can philosophers realize what it was about. And by then it's too late to change things. It wasn't until the time of Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) that the true nature of the Enlightenment was understood, and Kant did nothing to change the Enlightenment; he just consciously perpetuated it.Marx (1818 – 1883) found Hegel's apt description to be indicative of the problem with philosophy and responded, "the philosophers have only interpreted the world differently, what matters is to change it."

8. "Who is also aware of the tremendous risk involved in faith – when he nevertheless makes the leap of faith – this [is] subjectivity … at its height." – S..ren Kierkegaard (1813 – 1855)In a memorable scene from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Indy deduced that the final step across his treacherous path was a leap of faith. And so it is in Kierkegaard's [wiki] theory of stages of life.The final stage, the religious stage, requires passionate, subjective belief rather than objective proof, in the paradoxical and the absurd. So, what's the absurd? That which Christianity asks us to accept as true, that God became man born of a virgin, suffered, died and was resurrected.Abraham was the ultimate "knight of faith" according to Kierkegaard. Without doubt there is no faith, and so in a state of "fear and trembling" Abraham was willing to break the universal moral law against murder by agreeing to kill his own son, Isaac. God rewarded Abraham's faith by providing a ram in place of Isaac for the sacrifice. Faith has its rewards, but it isn't rational. It's beyond reason. As Blaise Pascal said, "The heart has its reason which reason does not know."

9. "God is dead." – Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 – 1900)Well, you might not hear this one in a graduation speech, but you'll probably hear it in college. Actually, Nietzsche [wiki] never issued this famous proclamation in his own voice but rather put the words in the mouth of a character he called the madman and later in the mouth of another character, Zarathustra.Nevertheless, Nietzsche endorsed the words. "God is dead" is often mistaken as a statement of atheism. It is not, though Nietzsche himself was an atheist. "Dead" is metaphorical in this context, meaning belief in the God of Christianity is worn out, past its prime, and on the decline. God is lost as the center of life and the source of values. Nietzsche's madman noted that himself came too soon. No doubt Nietzsche, too, thought he was ahead of his time in heralding this news.

10. "There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide." – Albert Camus (1913 – 1960)Camus' [wiki] solution to the philosophical problem was to recognize and embrace life's absurdity. Suicide, though, remains an option if the absurdity becomes too much. Indeed Camus' own death in a car crash was ambiguous. Was it an accident or suicide?For Camus, the absurd hero is Sisyphus, a man from Greek mythology who is condemned by the gods for eternity to roll up a stone up a hill only to have it fall back again as it reaches the top. For Camus, Sisyphus typified all human beings: we must find a meaning in a world that is unresponsive or even hostile to us. Sisyphus, Camus believed, affirms life, choosing to go back down the hill and push the rock again each time. Camus wrote: "The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man'sheart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy."

11. "One cannot step twice in the same river." – Heraclitus (ca. 540 – ca. 480 BCE)Heraclitus definitely isn't alone here. His message was that reality is constantly changing it's an ongoing process rather than a fixed and stable product. Buddhism shares a similar metaphysical view with the idea of annica, the claim that all reality is fleeting and impermanent.In modern times Henri Bergson (1859 – 1941) described time as a process that is experienced. An hour waiting in line is different from an hour at play. Today contemporary physics lends credence to process philosophy with the realization that even apparently stable objects, like marble statues, are actually buzzing bunches of electrons and other subatomic particles deep down.

VicDienekes
04-30-2007, 08:32 AM
"Kant did nothing to change the Enlightenment"

Er...is that a joke?

ninjashoes
04-30-2007, 01:27 PM
That was an awesome read, repped.

Bruce Lee
04-30-2007, 05:30 PM
Fuck Hobbes.

nakedrear
05-01-2007, 10:12 PM
I actually believe in the "doesn't make a sound" response to the old tree question.

When I speak to you, what is happening when you hear me is that my sound waves are actually floating out and literally touching you--rattling around in your ear bones. If you put a sound proof glass between you and me, throw some soundproof headphones upon myself and I scream my lungs out, guess what you get? Sound waves. Not sound. Two different things. Sound occurs in the ear not in space.

fightinfreddy
07-11-2007, 08:29 AM
I like the tree thing too

fightinfreddy
07-11-2007, 08:33 AM
never heard the frederick quote

chinkoo
08-19-2007, 09:47 AM
I also disagree with Hobbes. For the most part i believe humans are inherently social.

amanamagus
03-08-2008, 06:30 AM
I actually believe in the "doesn't make a sound" response to the old tree question.

When I speak to you, what is happening when you hear me is that my sound waves are actually floating out and literally touching you--rattling around in your ear bones. If you put a sound proof glass between you and me, throw some soundproof headphones upon myself and I scream my lungs out, guess what you get? Sound waves. Not sound. Two different things. Sound occurs in the ear not in space.
Interesting.

amanamagus
03-08-2008, 06:35 AM
How to Think
Managing brain resources in an age of complexity.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007

When I applied for my faculty job at the MIT Media Lab, I had to write a teaching statement. One of the things I proposed was to teach a class called "How to Think," which would focus on how to be creative, thoughtful, and powerful in a world where problems are extremely complex, targets are continuously moving, and our brains often seem like nodes of enormous networks that constantly reconfigure. In the process of thinking about this, I composed 10 rules, which I sometimes share with students. I've listed them here, followed by some practical advice on implementation.

1. Synthesize new ideas constantly. Never read passively. Annotate, model, think, and synthesize while you read, even when you're reading what you conceive to be introductory stuff. That way, you will always aim towards understanding things at a resolution fine enough for you to be creative.

2. Learn how to learn (rapidly). One of the most important talents for the 21st century is the ability to learn almost anything instantly, so cultivate this talent. Be able to rapidly prototype ideas. Know how your brain works. (I often need a 20-minute power nap after loading a lot into my brain, followed by half a cup of coffee. Knowing how my brain operates enables me to use it well.)

3. Work backward from your goal. Or else you may never get there. If you work forward, you may invent something profound--or you might not. If you work backward, then you have at least directed your efforts at something important to you.

4. Always have a long-term plan. Even if you change it every day. The act of making the plan alone is worth it. And even if you revise it often, you're guaranteed to be learning something.

5. Make contingency maps. Draw all the things you need to do on a big piece of paper, and find out which things depend on other things. Then, find the things that are not dependent on anything but have the most dependents, and finish them first.

6. Collaborate.

7. Make your mistakes quickly. You may mess things up on the first try, but do it fast, and then move on. Document what led to the error so that you learn what to recognize, and then move on. Get the mistakes out of the way. As Shakespeare put it, "Our doubts are traitors, and make us lose the good we oft might win, by fearing to attempt."

8. As you develop skills, write up best-practices protocols. That way, when you return to something you've done, you can make it routine. Instinctualize conscious control.

9. Document everything obsessively. If you don't record it, it may never have an impact on the world. Much of creativity is learning how to see things properly. Most profound scientific discoveries are surprises. But if you don't document and digest every observation and learn to trust your eyes, then you will not know when you have seen a surprise.

10. Keep it simple. If it looks like something hard to engineer, it probably is. If you can spend two days thinking of ways to make it 10 times simpler, do it. It will work better, be more reliable, and have a bigger impact on the world. And learn, if only to know what has failed before. Remember the old saying, "Six months in the lab can save an afternoon in the library."

Two practical notes. The first is in the arena of time management. I really like what I call logarithmic time planning, in which events that are close at hand are scheduled with finer resolution than events that are far off. For example, things that happen tomorrow should be scheduled down to the minute, things that happen next week should be scheduled down to the hour, and things that happen next year should be scheduled down to the day. Why do all calendar programs force you to pick the exact minute something happens when you are trying to schedule it a year out? I just use a word processor to schedule all my events, tasks, and commitments, with resolution fading away the farther I look into the future. (It would be nice, though, to have a software tool that would gently help you make the schedule higher-resolution as time passes...)

The second practical note: I find it really useful to write and draw while talking with someone, composing conversation summaries on pieces of paper or pages of notepads. I often use plenty of color annotation to highlight salient points. At the end of the conversation, I digitally photograph the piece of paper so that I capture the entire flow of the conversation and the thoughts that emerged. The person I've conversed with usually gets to keep the original piece of paper, and the digital photograph is uploaded to my computer for keyword tagging and archiving. This way I can call up all the images, sketches, ideas, references, and action items from a brief note that I took during a five-minute meeting at a coffee shop years ago--at a touch, on my laptop. With 10-megapixel cameras costing just over $100, you can easily capture a dozen full pages in a single shot, in just a second.

blevunly
03-08-2008, 06:42 AM
I agree with Hobbes

Leibniz admits to fatalism, then admits to believing in free will very contradictary.

Thomas Ace
03-10-2008, 12:30 AM
I actually believe in the "doesn't make a sound" response to the old tree question.

When I speak to you, what is happening when you hear me is that my sound waves are actually floating out and literally touching you--rattling around in your ear bones. If you put a sound proof glass between you and me, throw some soundproof headphones upon myself and I scream my lungs out, guess what you get? Sound waves. Not sound. Two different things. Sound occurs in the ear not in space.

Repped for making absolute sense.

Thomas Ace
03-10-2008, 12:32 AM
I agree with Hobbes

Leibniz admits to fatalism, then admits to believing in free will very contradictary.

I also agree with Hobbes. Good post.