View Full Version : Vista?


ninjashoes
02-07-2007, 07:41 AM
what does it offer me that xp doesent? why does it need such high system req?

Blunt Object
02-07-2007, 07:45 AM
what does it offer me that xp doesent? why does it need such high system req?

wtf is vista anyway???

amanamagus
02-07-2007, 02:00 PM
Ten Reasons to Buy Windows Vista
And a few reasons to think twice before upgrading.

Michael Desmond

Unless you've been living under a rock for the past few months, you probably know that the latest version of Windows--called Vista--is due to hit store shelves later this year (in time for the holidays, Microsoft tells us). The successor to Windows XP offers a little something for everyone, from eye-catching graphics and new bundled applications to more-rigorous security. In fact, there is so much in the new operating system that it can be tough to get a handle on it all.

I've been noodling around with a recent beta version of Windows Vista (Build 5270) and had a chance to make some observations. While the sleek new look and polished interface caught my eye, it's what's under the covers that impressed me most. Microsoft's done a great job of improving security across the board. Things like Windows and spyware library updates are streamlined, and I definitely appreciate the more robust Backup software.

Still, there's plenty of unfinished work left to do. Internet Explorer 7 struggled to properly render some Web pages, and I found local network connectivity to be a hit-or-miss affair. And then there's the stuff that isn't even in there yet--like the intriguing Windows Sidebar, which will put real-time weather info, stock quotes, system status, RSS feeds, and other information on the display.

So during my time with Windows Vista, I kept an eye out for the reasons I--and you--might ultimately want to lay my hands on the new OS when it's available. And frankly, if you buy a new Windows-based PC at the end of this year or any time in, say, the next five years, you'll probably end up with Vista by default.

Keep in mind, this is based solely on my experience with prerelease software (and a whole new beta could be out by the time you read this). Features get tweaked, they come and go, but from what we can tell, Vista is now starting to harden into the product that will be running many, many desktops for the foreseeable future. And by and large, that's a good thing.

Here's what to be excited about:

1. Security, security, security: Windows XP Service Pack 2 patched a lot of holes, but Vista takes security to the next level. There are literally too many changes to list here, from the bidirectional software firewall that monitors inbound and outbound traffic to Windows Services Hardening, which prevents obscure background processes from being hijacked and changing your system. There's also full-disk encryption, which prevents thieves from accessing your data, even if they steal the PC out from under your nose.

Perhaps most crucial (and least sexy) is the long-overdue User Account Protection, which invokes administrator privileges as needed, such as during driver updates or software installations. UAP makes it much more convenient for users to operate Vista with limited rights (meaning the system won't let them do certain things, like load software, without clearance from an administrator). This in turn limits the ability of malware to hose your system.

2. Internet Explorer 7: IE gets a much-needed, Firefox-inspired makeover, complete with tabbed pages and better privacy management. There's also the color-coded Address Bar that lets you know if a page is secured by a digital key, or, thanks to new antiphishing features, if it's a phony Web site just looking to steal information about you.

These features will all be available for Windows XP users who download IE7. But Vista users get an important extra level of protection: IE7 on Vista will run in what Microsoft calls "protected mode"--a limited-rights mode that prevents third-party code from reaching your system. It's about darn time.

3. Righteous eye candy: For the first time, Microsoft is building high-end graphics effects into Windows. The touted Aero Glass interface features visually engaging 3D rendering, animation, and transparencies. Translucent icons, program windows, and other elements not only look cool, they add depth and context to the interface. For example, hover your cursor over minimized programs that rest on the taskbar and you'll be able to see real-time previews of what's running in each window without opening them full-screen. Now you can see what's going on behind the scenes, albeit at a cost: You need powerful graphics hardware and a robust system to manage all the effects.

4. Desktop search: Microsoft has been getting its lunch handed to it by Google and Yahoo on the desktop, but Vista could change all that. The new OS tightly integrates instant desktop search, doing away with the glacially slow and inadequate search function in XP. Powerful indexing and user-assignable metadata make searching for all kinds of data--including files, e-mails, and Web content--a lot easier. And if you're running Vista on a Windows Longhorn network, you can perform searches across the network to other PCs.

5. Better updates: Vista does away with using Internet Explorer to access Windows Update, instead utilizing a new application to handle the chore of keeping your system patched and up-to-date. The result is quicker response and a more tightly streamlined process. The update-tracking mechanism, for instance, is much quicker to display information about your installation. And now key components, such as the Windows Defender antispyware module, get their updates through this central point. Like other housekeeping features, a better Windows Update isn't a gee-whiz upgrade, but it should make it easier--and more pleasant--to keep your PC secure.

6. More media: Over the years, one of the key reasons to upgrade versions of Windows has been the free stuff Gates and Company toss into the new OS, and Vista is no exception. Windows Media Player (perhaps my least favorite application of all time) gets a welcome update that turns the once-bloated player into an effective MP3 library. The Windows Photo Gallery finally adds competent photo-library-management functionality to Windows, so you can organize photos; apply metatags, titles, and ratings; and do things like light editing and printing. The DVD Maker application, which was still very rough when I looked at it, promises to add moviemaking capabilities--along the lines of Movie Maker--to the operating system. There are even some nice new games tucked into the bundle.

7. Parental controls: Families, schools, and libraries will appreciate the tuned-up parental controls, which let you limit access in a variety of ways. Web filtering can block specific sites, screen out objectionable content by selected type, and lock out file downloads. You can also restrict each account's access by time of day or day of the week. As a dad, I can tell you this will be great for keeping kids off the PC while you're at work, for instance. You can even block access to games based on their Entertainment Software Rating Board ratings.

8. Better backups: When Windows 95 first came out, the typical hard disk was, maybe, 300MB in size. Today, desktops routinely ship with 300GB or 400GB hard drives. And yet, the built-in data-backup software in Windows has changed little in the past decade. Windows Vista boasts a much-improved backup program that should help users avoid wholesale digital meltdowns. Microsoft also tweaked the useful System Restore feature--which takes snapshots of your system state so you can recover from a nasty infection or botched software installation.

9. Peer-to-peer collaboration: The Windows Collaboration module uses peer-to-peer technology to let Vista users work together in a shared workspace. You can form ad hoc workgroups and then jointly work on documents, present applications, and pass messages. You can even post "handouts" for others to review.

10. Quick setup: Beta code alert: There are some Vista features I hope dearly for even though they haven't been built yet. This is one of them. Jim Allchin, Microsoft's co-president, says that Windows Vista boasts a re-engineered install routine, which will slash setup times from about an hour to as little as 15 minutes. Hurray! The new code wasn't in the beta version of Vista that Microsoft sent to me--my aging rig took well over an hour to set up--so I'll believe it when I see it. Still, any improvement in this area is welcome.
Five Things That Will Give You Pause

All this is not to say that Vista is a slam-dunk and everyone should be running out to buy it as soon as Microsoft takes the wraps off. Heck, Windows XP has developed into a fairly stable, increasingly secure OS. Why mess with that?

Yes, during my time with Vista, I've found more than enough features to get excited about--features that will make a sizable chunk of Windows users want to upgrade. So why would anyone in their right mind stick with what they've got? Here are a few reasons:

Pay that piper: Vista is an operating system. It's the stuff your applications run on. But it'll cost $100 or more to make the switch. Unless you're buying a new PC and starting from scratch, you may be better off saving the money for something else.

Where's my antivirus?: For all the hype about security in Windows Vista, users may be disappointed to learn that antivirus software will not be part of the package. There's every indication that an online subscription service--possibly under the OneCare rubric--will offer antivirus protection to Vista users down the road. But for the time being, you'll need to turn to third-party companies like Symantec, McAfee, Grisoft, and others for virus protection.

Watch that hourglass: Vista is a power hog. Unless you have a top-end PC with high-end graphics hardware, for instance, you won't see one of the coolest parts of the new OS--the Aero Glass interface. Microsoft did the smart thing by offering Aero Basic and Windows Classic looks as well, which will let older and slower PCs run Vista. It just won't look as pretty.

Curse the learning curve: Microsoft has already ditched some aggressive ideas--such as the whole "virtual folders" thing--because the concepts proved too confusing for users. Even so, you'll find that the new Windows changes a lot of old tricks, and not always for the better. Heck, it took me almost five minutes to find the Run command, which used to show up right in the Start menu. And many users may struggle with the new power scheme, which defaults to putting the PC into hibernation rather than shutting down. I know it frustrated me the first time I wanted to power down the system to swap out a disk drive.

Meet the old boss, same as the new boss: Microsoft has added lots of new stuff to Vista, but some features are just warmed-over fare. Windows Mail is nothing more than a rebranded Outlook Express, and Windows Defender is simply an updated version of Microsoft AntiSpyware.

So keep your eyes peeled for future previews of Vista. It may not be perfect (what software is?), but in a lot of ways, it's a giant leap forward.

amanamagus
02-07-2007, 02:01 PM
Also read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista

fulszjep
02-09-2007, 02:51 AM
The internet 7 sucked. The windows defender did not seem like it did much. Cheap version of adaware

lilpimp84
02-24-2007, 04:02 PM
ok then i guess i'm the only one that is excited about vista. Its basically XP with a new coat of paint. Which was the same case with win 2k. Now when Win Xp was coming out everybody was like Awww i'm not upgrading it is a memory hogg and doesn't play my old games and yada yada. I personally think that XP pro is the best Operating system you can get. Tiger has alot of potential and neat things that Vista is actually taking a step further. now before i get to that let me explain why Vista takes so much RAM. Basically Data manipulation occurs on different levels. To that extent modern computers have a hierarchy of several levels of data caches to store and manipulate data, ranging from registers and L1 cache down to hard drives and their own cache. This system of cache layers works very well in hiding the speed differences between various layers, but there are still large gaps between places such as the CPU and RAM, and RAM and hard drives. One possible improvement - and certainly the most effective solution that Microsoft has implemented in Vista - is to try to move up required data to a higher layer, in this case by keeping more data in RAM than just the bare minimum.SuperFetch, a new technology designed to cache as much data as RAM space allows. Previously, Windows XP had a more basic implementation of this idea called prefetch, which used trace logs of programs loading in order to help XP optimize the loading sequence. SuperFetch in turn takes things a step further by not only figuring out what data is required to launch an application, but it actually loads this data into memory as space allows so that if it's needed at a later point the data is already in RAM instead of still residing on the hard drive.

I've read that you are required for at least 1GB of ram for this process to work and at least 2-3 GB for it to be effective. This process is suppose to make everything superspeedy. another thing i'm looking forward to is how they are implementing ipv6 and the new networking structure. its a little more complicated than superfetch so i won't go into details. and also with vista we still have System Restore but now we have an entirely new feature built in. Its called Shadow Copy. This allows System Restore to completely backup all files now and not just system files, and it allows Windows to restore single files instead of entire snapshots. I read that Apple plans to release this same technology in the next update to their OS.


Well, our computers are already chock full of DRM. Most Windows XP users have Media Player, so that's Windows Media DRM right there. Installed iTunes? You now have FairPlay DRM. Do you have a legal DVD playing codec installed? You've got the Content Scrambling System DRM installed, and probably Macrovision too. Product Activation? That already exists in Windows XP and Microsoft Office, and it's not nearly the headache the detractors make it out to be. We upgrade our home PCs all the time here at ET, and none of us has had a problem. I personally have never had trouble activating Windows XP; the worst that's happened was one time that I had to call Microsoft and get an activation code. I didn't even talk to a human being. I just entered in one alphanumeric code and the voice read back to me an activation code. DRM effectively exists on most store-bought games (console or PC), on Valve's Steam download service—you name it. Software to make sure you are supposed to be using that paid-for content is literally everywhere already.

So really, what's different in Vista? It all boils down to support for HD-DVD and Blu-ray, really. The AACS DRM used by both formats is supported in Vista. Both formats also require a secure digital video output path. An HD-DVD or Blu-ray movie can, optionally, say "if they don't have that protected digital video pathway via HDCP, reduce the resolution of the output." Some movies will have this and some won't, and I hear there's supposed to be some clear labeling on the box. Vista supports this feature as well. Many readers seemed to think the protected digital video path in Vista means they'll have to buy a new monitor. Nothing could be further from the truth. You can use Vista and all its features just fine with your existing monitor. The OS just supports this requirement of HD-DVD and Blu-ray. Any operating system that does not support HDCP in this way will always reduce the resolution of those HD-DVD or Blu-ray discs that choose to require it. In other words, expect similar DRM features to be added to operating systems such as OS X or for them to have crippled support for HD-DVD and Blu-ray, or no support at all.

But the key word here is support. Vista supports these DRM schemes, but does not require them. There is absolutely nothing in Vista that will require you to use content with DRM. There is nothing that will prevent you from running those applications that strip the DRM from your DVDs. Your ripped movies and MP3s and other DRM-less content will work just fine. Vista will not phone home to report your illegal file sharing activities and notify the MPAA and RIAA and phone your mom who won't say boy are you gonna get it when your father gets home.

The anti-DRM set needs to chill out a little bit with the conspiracy theories. I'm not a fan of DRM, either. As much as I love iTunes, I refuse to buy a single video or song from the iTunes Music Store, because I think Apple's DRM restrictions stink and that $.99 per song is a total rip-off, because it's the per-song equivalent of the existing CD prices, which are also a rip-off—but the economics of digital music distribution are about a hundred times better for the companies involved. I don't like DRM on HD-DVD and Blu-ray discs, and I'm not sure if I'm going to be much of a customer of those either (it depends on how other alternatives shake out). I'm not much of a fan of some of the more intrusive copy-protection schemes on PC games, and I've avoided buying some games strictly because the copy protection they use is too intrusive.

But that doesn't mean I have to hate Vista for having thorough DRM support, because they're not forcing me to use it. I will continue to vote with my dollars by not buying content whose DRM restrictions I don't agree with. I'm just not going to avoid buying Vista because of its DRM support any more than I avoid buying an iPod or any other digital music player that supports DRM (which is, you know, all of them).


__________________________________________________
edit:
I actually have Vista. I do enjoy it. Its basically xp with a new coat of paint in terms of overall look and appeal. the aero is cool but eh i could do without it. I love everything they added. there are alot of things added that one time or another i was like damn why don't they just... oh ok they did it in vista cool!
one thing people will find useful is they sepurated the program/and system processes in the task manager. so those of you that do not know the difference between one process and another won't be closing or attempting to close out of anything important. Everything in Vista is nicer and neater than the things in XP. some things are moved around but overall its the same ol windows.

RoryZilla
02-28-2007, 04:36 AM
I just ordered a new notebook with the 2.0 ghz Turionx2 processors, 120 gig hard drive and 2 gb of ram, and the Nvidia graphics card. It is going to be way better than what I am fucking with now.

Rynoplasty
02-28-2007, 10:45 AM
I have heard that Vista allows microsoft to look at and judge what is on your pc as "acceptable" and zap the info or even operating system if it deems it "pirated" or "unacceptable" so I will be staying away.

ninjashoes
02-28-2007, 11:52 AM
I have heard that Vista allows microsoft to look at and judge what is on your pc as "acceptable" and zap the info or even operating system if it deems it "pirated" or "unacceptable" so I will be staying away.

wtf, that would be messed up

automatic updates make me paranoid

ninjashoes
02-28-2007, 11:53 AM
thanks for the posts though guys, Vista is looking pretty innovative

oddtopsy
03-01-2007, 02:10 AM
its the shit! i dont think you need high req either. my friend got a version that petty much molds itself to your computer so it doesnt overwork it..

chop
03-01-2007, 03:12 AM
I got some new windows upgrade, you can iopen tabs instead of opening new windows while on the internet

WatcH OuT
03-01-2007, 06:41 AM
I had Vista installed but games didn't run smoothly and some other things either as my X-FI had some issues.

So installed back XP as long problems aren't getting solved.

Vista offers a newer look, safer, DX 10 that's it I think...